These days, I wondered what he thought of Communion and Liberation of Ruby case, and more generally of the latest releases of Silvio. So I did search the site Journal, with poor results, and then on the internal movement magazine, where I found this article: "Whoever saves politics? .
The article begins well enough:
Before repulsive with the squalor that is afloat. Before the rebellion made way for a political battle and a judicial investigation, which is putting the good of all. Maybe even before the anger and the punishment for a country that would need far and finds himself mired in bungabunga and annizero. Before all this, or at least in all this, if we are the shock really fair of that name and dismay. That is, malaise. Discomfort. [...] For the lie to those who wait "to change our lives" is any bag full of Euros, in return pocketed maybe giving yourself pushing or elbowing your daughter to do it. And also how to use it for anything to attack an opponent who has not managed to put down by force of votes and elections. Sex, money and politics.
Then you start with the questions:
course, the investigation is clear. [...] Be very serious, to be taken into account, but after arriving, because basically we know that it is difficult to get in the shoes of those who cast the first stone. A moment earlier, however, is that unease, uneasiness deep. Which, if taken seriously, leads to a question: who can save us from this? Who can get us out of a depressing so we treat ourselves and others? Is there anything that can fill my life more than sex, money and power, or anything that we can reduce our desire for happiness?
Answers to the questions are the Church and Christianity. It also explains quite well why the church (or CL) is not criticizing Berlusconi
But here we can also understand the realism of the criteria that the Church has always used to judge the politics and politicians: the common good [. ..] first and most consistent and dell'ineccepibilità morale of the individual. [...] Because if it is only Christ who saves the human being, to maintain his presence in history - the church - means allowing space in the world, here and now. It means opening up the possibility that powerful, soubrette, judges and journalists (and us with them) encounter something that is worth living, and change.
it does not matter what you do at home, keep it if the church you're ok.
This is what we call politics. Not salvation, but that leaves room for freedom in this place that also saves the political [...] Something infinitely greater. Someone real.
So, in summary, even Silvio Berlusconi, perhaps if something bad did it (although the PM is just the bad guys, eh!), what matters is the common good.
and the common good is to maintain the church.
point.
This position was confirmed by the CL CL Bishop Luigi Negri, in an interview the Press:
In terms of individual conduct directed at Berlusconi the same recommendations to anyone else. Personal opinion, it was the behavior only to God
In my humble opinion, the assessment of the personal conduct of the Prime Minister of a nation belongs to all citizens who govern, but they are opinions.
there the Catholic East for the remainder of the term to the non-negotiable principles: life, family, freedom of education.
is almost a program of this government. Indeed, it seems the upcoming campaign Silvio!
The ethical incoherence of a ruler does not destroy the well-being and freedom of the people, the attacks on the family and the sanctity of life, devastate the social life.
Question. Go to Troy is not an attack on the family? Have relationships with several women and two divorces behind even? Ok, I'm getting whatever ...
The priorities are the preservation of life from conception to natural end, the heterosexual family (the only fertile), the possibility for the Church to carry out the training activity and cultural exchange between people.
It is, is just dictating the government's program ... and the scandals of the Prime Minister?
If there are crimes it is up to established laws, it is unacceptable to condemn a priori. A politician is more or less valuable based on what is morally committed to promoting the common good.
And here is connected with the preceding article. With regard to the ineligibility of condemned a priori thought so even if Eluana? And then concludes:
to hurt this company are I say, the secular law, morality theorized and practiced by those floods us with chatter about the relevance of certain public private behavior.
Call the police of using their public office to make a young North African is a private behavior.
conclude, I am not sure this is the official position of CL or only those who wrote the article, I hope that some friend of the movement we read and give us his point of view.
0 comments:
Post a Comment